G. Lee Aikin, DC Statehood Green Party candidate for "Shadow" Representative to Congress
ADVANTAGES TO BUSINESSES
Although
the advantages of this flexible system to individuals are obvious,
there are numerous potential advantages for management as well.
1.
Lower turnover in boring types of work should result as workers
recognize the twin advantages of financial and job security and
freedom to pursue personal goals. Anyone can stand 3 or 6 months of
routine work if they know they will have 3 months to work on their
favorite project after that.
2.
Better quality workmanship with all its resulting savings should
result from employees feeling less bored and routinized in their
jobs.
3.
Fewer malcontents and people stuck at their level of incompetence
(“Peter Principle”) should result as people experiment with
different jobs during their “free” quarters, or as they make a
gradual transition from one career to another as their needs and
economic picture change. People who are unhappy or incompetent in
their work would have the opportunity to try out various forms of
work until they find the one ideally suited to them.
4. The greater freedom to use
both student trainees and mature workers who are in transition should
result in the acquisition of more competent and experienced
employees.
5.
The employer wouldn't have to feel like an S.O.B. Every time economic
factors raised the specter of job layoffs. The savings in medical
costs alone for executive ulcers should be considerable.
6, Since the opportunity to
elect leave quarters could operate on a seniority basis, the people
rotating on and off the job would be the most experienced workers,
thereby causing minimal disruptions and loss of readjustment time
for the orderly flow of work. [
7.
The choice of working fewer quarters by senior people would lower
wage costs and improve opportunities for upward mobility.
While
this is by no means an exhaustive list of the advantages that could
accrue to management, it should serve to stimulate the imagination of
any executive who might wish to seriously consider this system. It
should be of special interest to those businesses that are being
hardest hit by the current energy and financial crunch, like the
auto industry, or those which have been in serious trouble for some
time like the banking and housing construction industries.
LABOR/MANAGEMENT
COOPERATION
Flexible
provisions to increase or decrease quarters available could be linked
to some standard measure such as city, state or national unemployment
figures.
Although implementation of the
Quarter System could have a major impact on the workplace, the
transition should not be difficult with good labor/management
coordination. Naturally a number of modifications would have to be
made in existing labor contract language.
The
following sample contract provisions are modifications based on a
Collective Agreement which the author has worked under personally.
These provisions contain points favorable to both employees and
management such as might be worked out through give-and-take
negotiations. Although this particular contract is designed in terms
of a white collar work situation, it's adaptability to the blue
collar work force should not be hard to imagine.
SAMPLE
LABOR CONTRACT LANGUAGE
A) A total of __[
40 ]__
quarters of leave shall be available to the __[
100 ]__
bargaining unit members per (calendar/contract) year. [Some
percentage of total quarters worked annually by all full time
bargaining unit members should be chosen, such as 15%. This figure
could be made flexible for firms with rapidly changing
conditions—i.e., the auto industry.] [In the case above the figure is
10%.]
B)
Bargaining unit members may elect leave quarters (LQ) on the basis of
seniority up to 2 quarters per year. Deviation for strict seniority
will be permitted in hardship cases or where essential knowledge and
skills of the most senior workers are needed.
C)
Employees using LQ will accrue annual and sick leave on a prorated
basis, i.e., workers eligible for 13 days each of annual and sick
leave will earn 3 ¼ days of each during all quarters worked.
D)
Employees may elect to receive full salary during quarters worked or
proportional salary over 12 months, i.e., a person working 2 quarters
could choose to receive 6 months pay at full salary or half salary
over a 12 month period.
E)
In most cases, employees will inform the union and management of
their quarter work plans and wishes at the beginning of each year.
Otherwise the employee should inform management of the intent/need to
take LQ at least one month in advance. Exceptions may be made for
hardship cases.
F)
The employee will notify management one month in advance whether or
not he/she intends to return to work. If the employee does not
intend to return, he/she will notify management of this in writing.
Failure to do so may result in the loss of some severance benefits.
G)
If reduction in force (lay-offs) become necessary the employer will
notify the union of the number of quarters in specific job
classifications that need to be reduced. The union will then poll
the membership to determine if some employees would be interested in
working fewer quarters, eighths, or months during the crisis period.
H)
An employee hired to work a single quarter (temporary hire) will not
pay the initiation fee, but will begin paying monthly union dues upon
completing the probationary period.
I)
Every effort will be made to enable employees to take LQ so as to
coordinate with vacation and work schedules of spouses and children.
J)
When the local unemployment rate rises above ________%, employees
taking LQ shall not work for other establishments employing more than
________ persons. Failure to observe this rule may result in loss of
reinstatement rights. [These figures could be made flexible based on
the prevailing unemployment situation, i.e., 9% - 20 employees, 12% -
5 employees.]
AN
IMPROVED NATIONAL ECONOMIC INDICATOR IS NEEDED
The economic indicator Gross
Domestic Product has been a valuable tool for measuring national
economic progress and prosperity. However, the recent upsurge in
unemployment and decline of our cities and environment follows what
had been a period of apparent rising monetary prosperity. Now it is
especially important to consider what contribution the many
unemployed can and do make.
There
are a great many activities of value to a nation's prosperity which
can be quantified, but do not normally appear in the GDP measure.
They include home maintenance and improvements, man and woman-hours
spent in volunteer work (hospital aides, tutoring, counseling,
scouting, etc.), growing and preserving food for family consumption,
and sewing clothes and other craft production for home use. Engaging
or failing to engage in such activities can have a tremendous
cumulative impact on the national welfare, and consequently they
deserved to be measured.
One
only need think back to the destruction of Bedford-Styvesant in the
Bronx, or the areas where many foreclosures or plant closings like in
Detroit are resulting in derelict neighborhoods, to comprehend the
importance of these kinds of individual effort.
It
is therefore proposed that a new additional economic indicator be
introduced, which could be called the Real Domestic Product
Supplement (RDPS). This would undertake to measure all the
activities mentioned above, plus any other domestic individual
activities which can be quantified as goods or services that are not
already included in the GDP [or in tax filings]. Because the results
are not usually permanent and subject to verification, it would not
include routine family maintenance activities like doing laundry,
cooking, dish washing, trash hauling, shoveling snow, house cleaning,
child care, etc. It would, however, include major repairs and home
improvements as well as short term caring for children or other paid
work for people who are not family members which falls below the IRS
threshold for regular income reporting.
COLLECTING THE DATA
A
simple way to implement this new measuring system would be as an
addendum to the Federal Income Tax. Each year along with the tax
forms (or at Income Tax time for those below the taxable income
level) everyone would be urged to submit a form outlining their
production of goods and services not appearing on the regular tax
forms. Each person would list the estimated fair market value of his
or her goods and services minus the cost of materials used in their
production. A person who did not create any supplemental goods or
services would submit a form or mark an appropriate line in the tax
form saying NONE.
The
reverse of the form could present tables of representative fair
market values for common goods and services. Unskilled volunteer
work would be rated at the prevailing minimum wage for the region in
question. Services requiring a higher level of education or
organizational skill and experience, i.e., tutoring, scout troop
leadership, unpaid school board service, etc., would be valued at the
local commercial rate for similar activities. These could be listed
on the form or available on the Internet.
A
representative Family Production Form might contain items like the
following [This sample family is imagined to comprise a wife who
works part-time, a husband who was required by his employer to take
the Spring Quarter off, a daughter 15, and a son 12.]:
Person Goods & Services/Est. F.M. Value Less Production Costs & Materials Net Value
Wife Sewed 8 dresses $ 480 cloth & notions $ 150 $ 330
“ Sewed 10 children's clothes 240 cloth & notions 8 160
“ Scout troop leader (est. val. gasoline (40 trips x 10 mi.
40 wks. x 3 hrs. x $11) 1,320 RT x 20 mpg. x $3.50/gal.) 70 1,250
Husb. Paved side patio 1,500 permit, cement, slate, rail 400 1,100
H. & W. Fruit & Vegetable Garden 1,800 seeds, tools, fertilizer, etc. 300 1,500
Wife Home freezing, preserving 2,400 veg., meat & containers 450 1,950
Son Paper route, shovel snow 550 bike repairs, shovels, salt 80 470
Daugh. Baby sitting (75 hrs. x $6/hr.) 450 crayons, etc. 30 420
TOTAL
SUPPLEMENTAL PRODUCTION VALUE $ 7,180
The total family production
multiplied by 4 = $28,720. This is more than the husband was earning
in a non-union job. Thus the Supplemental Production Value created
by this family is more than he lost from being laid off for the
Spring Quarter. This time he productively used by putting in a large
garden and paving the patio, feeding his family and enhancing his
home's value.
Under
the Quarter System, preparing the annual Real Domestic Product
Supplement report would help people understand the true
value of their contributions. It would further a sense of pride and accomplishment while showing that
taking quarters off does not need to cause a significant drop in
family income or resources. In fact, that income might even be
improved.
Although
filing this form need not be compulsory, voluntary compliance could
be encouraged by means of a reward/incentive system. One such system
might be to assign each form returned a number and have a
lottery-type drawing with several large prizes and a number of
smaller ones. This kind of incentive might particularly motivate
participation by people who do not earn enough to file a regular Tax
Return, including the retired who would actually have more free time
for home productivity.
The
annual drawing could even be a big televised event, featuring the
more productive drawing winners and praise for their individual
contribution to the nations well-being. Presidents, politicians, and
celebrities no doubt would want to take part. Handing out the big
checks then could also create motivation for all to participate.
Values like recycling, fine gardening and creativity could be
highlighted. Honesty of reporting could be encouraged by verifying
facts on any form chosen to win the largest prizes before awarding
money to the winners.
Enough
data should be collected in this manner to enable statisticians to
extrapolate for the total population. An alternative or additional
method of gathering this kind of date would be to use the Census
Bureau's household sampling procedures through their annual
spot-sampling census to update household information.
Recently and example was given regarding farmer self-sufficiency and dependency on the Agricultural Industrial Complex. It was pointed out that when a farmer saves seed from his crop for next years planting, it does not count as part of the GDP. When the farmer buys seed from Monsanto it is part of the GDP. Does this really make sense?
Recently and example was given regarding farmer self-sufficiency and dependency on the Agricultural Industrial Complex. It was pointed out that when a farmer saves seed from his crop for next years planting, it does not count as part of the GDP. When the farmer buys seed from Monsanto it is part of the GDP. Does this really make sense?
SOCIAL UTILITY OF THE RNP
Although
preparing the Real Domestic Product Supplement could be valuable even
under our current conditions as a measure of non-cash transactions
and the labor of young people, the many un- and under-employed and
retired people, it would truly prove its worth under the proposed
Quarter Work System. Under the Quarter System, the RDPS measure
would record both the increased home production and volunteer work
that could result from people taking off large blocks of time from
paid employment, and at the same time make people, especially the
young, aware that such production and services are considered a
benefit to the nation as well as to the individual.
Thus
the many individual acts which make the difference between a society
on the upswing and one in decline would at last be fully known, and
in some cases greatly rewarded. I believe that this could also prove
America is a lot healthier than many people think or say we are.
G. Lee Aikin, July 2012
1. First turnover in "boring" jobs is more due to low pay, mismanagement or a combination of the two rather then the interest level of the work.
ReplyDelete2. Better work also usually comes with better pay (to a certain point) as well as good management and better training in the job. Also many companies do not care about the savings from good work is the savings from high employee turn over is higher.
3. Malcontents and Peter principles are more from bad management and favoritism and would likely not go away during your quarter system since it comes more from people not from amount of time in a job.
4. This assumes a business care about having better trained employees. Many do not or they would provide better training now.
5 Emotional speculation with little basis in fact.
6. Actually having chunks of more experienced works leave even for a short amount of time does cause considerable disruption when many of the less experienced staff are left. This would cause more problems not less.
7. This assumes people would be paid a living salary and not paid by the hour (which is more common) and thus there would be a reason to take time off. Under the current hourly pay this is not true especially for the types of jobs seniors are forced into to pay for their life.
8. Your idea of the addendum to tax filing is hopeful but foolish. Many of those things cannot be documented in terms of time and many people do not keep the receipts needed to claim them either, also people would not report as much for fear of being taxed on it since most work is taxed. Volunteer hours of any sort are considered a donation not work and thus would not be reported.
As for the prize drawing, it would only encourage resentment and tampering. A can of worms best left alone.
9. Your system also would penalize the poor for either not having the time or money to do these extraneous activities.
While your ideas are coming from the right place, until you address the existence of the poor and the industry around them in your plans, they are doomed to fail. The poor will not go away overnight and become middle class and any plan that assumes that will be the case is broken substantially.
I do not see how you justify #9. Even someone with no production could submit the form listing "no production". That fact is just as useful in estimating the "Real Domestic Product." Regarding #5, I have spoken with people who have had to fire workers who felt really bad about it. Why would the prize drawing encourage resentment and tampering. Do you think this is what happens with Powerball or the state lotteries? I was interested in getting your comments on the previous "Lifestyles" post. Have you read it? Have you thought about designing one for yourself that I could use with your permission.
ReplyDeleteI have talked to bosses too that don't feel bad about firing workers at any point. That is anecdotal evidence at best.
DeleteBecause your prize would have a guaranteed winner (where lottery is chance) it would be very open to skewing the results to earn favors and the like. It's not like the government now is free of corruption.
While I have read your lifestyle post, my problem is such. It has no accounting for those in the current system who do not make enough now to pay all bills. My yearly average income is about 9 thousand. I am rooming with someone now to not be on social assistance but that amount is from working non stop all year round as a part time minimum wage retail worker.
Those like me do not have the luxury of getting a quarter of the year off because we cannot afford to. I would love to work more during the week, or have a job that paid better but there is more people clamoring for those jobs then can have one. I do have plenty of spare time though none to take a vacation and no money to support most hobbies. I also cannot afford many basic things in life such as health care or dental. If I am barely getting by on basic needs, there is not much money left over for optional activities that would promote the economy.
If older workers and those with adequate income were able to take such time off, there would be more opportunities for others to fill in. If lay-offs or furloughs were going to be required because of reduced business income or reduced municipal revenue, then this could be planned in advance, in the case of governments right now they are giving all workers a furlough for 3 or 4 days at a time. With this system they could furlough workers during slower periods for longer, planned ahead, more useful blocs of time.
ReplyDeleteEven if just 10% of workers were engaged in this system, that would lower the unemployment rate by 2 or 3%. If the current unemployment rate is 7.7%, then that could put the rate down into the 5% area which is considered quite good.
From what you describe about your life I suspect there is no union at your workplace. I also wonder if you live in a "right to work state". If you are not familiar with the term it is a system to keep unions from organizing, because it means workers can refuse to pay union dues even if there is a union, while at the same time enjoying the wages and other benefits that the union has negotiated with the employer.