Wednesday, November 25, 2015

DC Government Fails to Use $Millions of HUD Money, In Apparent Effort to Speed Up Gentrification

I recently attended a "Socialist Salon" on gentrification and the fight against it in the District of Columbia.  It was sponsored by Metro DC Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).  I was invited by another anti-Exelon testifier I had met at the recent Public Service Commission hearing.  Although they are strong Bernie Sanders supporters they hope this will not keep us from cooperating in fighting gentrification.  I can assure them, that at least in my case, it will not.

Their guest speaker at this anti-gentrification salon was Claire Cook, an organizer with the activist group ONE DC.  Ms. Cook divided us into several teams and then asked specific questions on low and middle income government figures, housing costs in DC, numbers of people on housing waiting lists in DC (72,000), and other pertinent questions.   After the teams presented their answers, we went into a more general discussion of the issues and possible solutions.

The younger members of the group seemed more interested in activism and ideals, whereas the older attendees focused more on specific things like legislation which could be used to modify and reduce the problem.  I feel both are necessary and need to be coordinated both to stimulate action and to make sure action is on target.  One guest there seemed particularly knowledgeable about the depth and complexity of the problem and I asked her to write me a guest article for posting.


Guest Post by Angela White Narain

Condition of Housing in the District of Columbia
Democratic Socialist Salon session, Nov. 19, 2015

In addressing some pressing issues on housing in the District of Columbia, Clair Cook, the guest speaker at the Salon, wanted to investigate yet again, the creation and development of a land trust and put in place limited cooperatives for low wealth folks to live in.

In 1998 Rick Eisen, esq and I were charged with the major responsibility of finding out why limited equity cooperatives did not work then in the District of Columbia.  I had asked my employer not to lend to a specific project of limited equity cooperatives that Hope Housing was developing in the Congress Heights neighborhood, because right across the street at that time, there was a major drug market.  I told them people will not buy and stay across the street, but in sum, within the next year several million banks dollars, and nonprofit lender dollars were lost because of the investment made in communities at that time when the market was not right for it.

The city has returned over $140,000,000 million dollars in the HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) funds from  DC Department of Housing and Community Development  to the Federal Government that could have been used to build thousands of affordable housing units.  DC has had this serious problem for years with HUD regarding their HOME funds, which are part of our federal entitlement dollars that we get from HUD every year.

That evening I suggested to the Salon group they should attend the Planning Meetings that are held every year, in which the city is supposed to use the comments to create a document called, a Consolidated Plan.*  This represents our invoice to HUD for our five federal entitlement programs to be acquired for the development and preservation of affordable housing in the District of Columbia.  In addition to HOME, the other 4 programs are:  Community Development Block Grants (CDBG), Housing opportunity with Aids (HOPWA), Supportive Housing Opportunity Program (SHOP), and Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG)

When I was a technical assistance provider for HUD under the HOME Technical Assistance Grant that I got [clarify?], we were asked to come into the District to see why DC was not using their HOME funds properly.  The Director at that time was Merrick Malone and manager was Mary Hammond and they would not let me and my team come in as directed by the DC HUD Field Office.  They have been returning money to HUD ever since, and not building housing for low wealth people on purpose.

Thus, regarding all of the last 3 former Mayors and including this one, their Homelessness initiatives are jokes.  They have been a way to pay out money to their friends for Homelessness Reports and Committees, as well as Commissions that they have never implemented.  The New Communities Initiatives is a major disaster but was created in the spirit of trying to create a replacement for the Hope VI Program, which is the demolition of public housing projects.

The best major redevelopment project is the Wheeler Creek Project wherein I used to serve on the board of directors, and is one of 5.  Other major public housing projects that are slated for redevelopment are: Barry Farm in Ward 8, Lincoln Heights - Richardson Dwelling in Ward 7, Northwest One in Ward 6, and Park Morton in Ward 1. The New Communities Initiative is funded through public bond financing that allows the District to leverage funding for development projects.

The amount of displacement of residents in public housing that has been done by the District has been criminal and the conditions of the units before they left have been horrible.  Harassment by local government for the redevelopment of Barry Farms has occurred over a 15 year period, starting in Mayor Williams' Administration.  To date over 20,000 people have been displaced.

For further information you can reach Angela White at her email address:   angelawhitenarain@gmail.com on any housing issue.


Additional comments by G. Lee Aikin:
Angela reports a total of 5 federal grant programs that provide housing related money to DC.  If the city has returned $140,000,000 to the feds over the years for the HOME program, I wonder how much money DC has failed to use from the other 4 programs she mentions?

* Unfortunately, the Consolidated Plan meetings for this year were already held in October and November.  However, this link provides contact information to follow up on this planning, and to learn when the next meetings will be held in 2016.

I decided to backtrack on some of the DC history and personnel.  I found that in February 2015,  Merrick Malone was appointed along with Kimberly Black King to the DC Housing Authority's Office of Capital Programs as Director and Chief Development Officer respectively.  Mr. Malone was a former head of DC Dept. of Housing and Community Development and Deputy Mayor of Economic Development during the Kelly and Barry administrations.  In addition to DC, he also has experience from Detroit in urban transformations in downtowns, school systems and neighborhoods.

The various DC administrations have worked vigorously to reduce the amount of housing for low wealth people and families.   Recently (9/17), the Current Newspapers have taken a look at this important issue.

While there is some evidence for suggesting that high concentrations of uniformly low wealth people may cause some problems, tearing down their homes and creating a homelessness problem is not the answer.  This article written almost 2 years ago describes this issue and how it has been conducted at Barry Farms and other locations and some of the results.  Wall to wall gentrification is not the solution.  In addition, the DC Housing Authority is also forcing people out of public housing to fix, flip and sell properties to gentrifiers.

Here is a very useful national map showing how much hourly wage one would need for a two bedroom rental in each state and DC.  The $28 an hour DC wage is even higher than what one needs in high priced California.


Here is information provided by DCSGP activist Jenefer Ellingston [Feb. 2016]


The head of a House panel wants information from the Obama administration on how many over-income families live in public housing—and how many needy families are still on waiting lists for assistance.
Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, wants the Housing and Urban Development Department to hand over by Feb. 10 all documents related to over-income public housing residents going back to October 2013, and wants a briefing on the issue for congressional staff by the end of this week. Chaffetz also requested the “annual number of over-income families and families on waiting lists for each year since 2005 for each public housing authority that participates in HUD’s public housing program,” according to hisJan. 27 letter to Secretary Julian Castro.
A controversial HUD inspector general report released in July estimated that the department would pay $104.4 million over the next year for public housing units occupied by over-income families that could otherwise be used for low-income people. HUD disputed that figure, saying the IG’s methodology to estimate the subsidy cost of housing over-income families contained a “serious flaw.”
The report, which attracted attention from Capitol Hill, included some extreme examples of over-income families living in public housing. In one case in New York City, a family of four that has been living in public housing since 1988 had an annual household income of $497,911 in 2013. But the number of over-income residents identified in the audit represented just 2.6 percent of all public housing households, and in most cases the families in question were over-income by less than $10,000. The term “over-income” applies to those public housing households that earn more than the income threshold established for their locality.
HUD would not comment on the Chaffetz letter. “Our protocol is always to respond directly to the requestor,” said department spokesman Jereon Brown. The committee had not yet received a response as of Jan. 29, said Chaffetz spokeswoman MJ Henshaw.
Under HUD regulations, once accepted into public housing, individual households and families can stay as long as they like regardless of increased earnings, provided they comply with rental agreements and remain good tenants. When a family in public housing becomes over-income, they no longer receive a subsidy from the government for their rent; they pay the unit’s full rent themselves.
HUD has said public housing authorities already have the ability to evict over-income tenants. A 2004 HUD rule allows PHAs to move families in public housing to the private market if they earn more than the income limit, “allowing authorities to address over-income families within the context of their own unique demographic and economic situations,” the IG report said.
In September, HUD sent PHAs a letter reminding them of their authority and flexibility in evicting over-income households. “HUD strongly encourages PHAs to utilize the discretion available to them to remove extremely-over-income families from public housing,” wrote Lourdes Castro Ramirez, HUD’s principal deputy assistant secretary for Public and Indian Housing, in the Sept. 3 letter. Ramirez recommended PHAs use some available tools to deal with the issue, including using the local area median income for program income limits instead of the national AMI, which HUD uses in certain markets with significantly higher incomes. HUD also suggested PHAs create a “preference for return” to public housing for those over-income households that are evicted if their income drops after moving out.
There are more than 3,000 public housing authorities across the country. Many PHAs count on the rent money from over-income families to help boost their budgets. 
HUD told auditors that if all over-income families were removed from public housing, it would need to request “nearly $116.5 million more in public housing operating subsidies annually,” according to the IG report. The presence of such households also helps de-concentrate poverty in public housing, and create sustainable mixed-income communities, according to HUD, PHAs and affordable housing advocates.

_
After I have given more thought to this issue or receive additional information, I will add to this article in the near future (you all come back).  Comments with information welcomed.

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Exelon/PEPCO takeover, PSC Hearing Nov. 17 & 18, 2015. They Desperately Need Our Ratepayers

Here is a report of some of the happenings at the hearings, plus some good anti-Exelon testimony.  Also periodic updates.


[3/11/16]  After several weeks of toing and froing, it appears that Mayor Bowser, the Office of the People's Council, and the Attorney General may have decided that the various changes in Exelon proposals do not make this company and it's obsolescent nuclear plants a good, safe fit for us, the DC rate and tax payers.  However the Public Service Commission could still vote to accept the new deal without DC officials signing off.  They have until April 7 to act.  Meanwhile  Exelon stock continues a steady rise.  Stock price hit a low in mid December (see 12/18/15 below) when the federal General Services Administration again came out against Exelon.  Since March 2nd the rise is continuous.  What do the stockholders know that we don't?  Is a final fix in?   
     On the other hand Pepco stock prices have been on a roller coaster.  Whatever is happening their stockholders don't seem to know what Exelon stockholders know.  On the other hand PEPCO stockholders may know what Exelon stockholders don't know.  Since March 2nd their shares have been trading much below the promised price near $28.  Is there possible market manipulation going on?  Making it appear that the Exelon deal will fail while those in the know buy PEPCO stock cheap.  Then get the guaranteed higher price when DC caves to the Exelon deal.
[3/15/16]  After a few more days it appears the Exelon stock has leveled off, and PEPCO stock is staying low.  Perhaps what is happening is that people far away figure that Exelon is going to win its bid, whereas people in DC believe that PEPCO will NOT be bought with the guaranteed payout.  Nevertheless, with a dividend of almost 5%, and the likelihood of other suitors in the future PEPCO is probably a decent buy if income is a goal.
[3/16/16]  This afternoon around 4pm I heard former Mayor Anthony Williams urging support for Exelon.  Then a leader on the Board of Trade also spoke in favor, listing all the old "benefits" they were selling 3 months ago.  We have not won yet!

[2/26/16]  The Public Service Commission has just voted 2 to 1 to ask some changes of  Exelon prior to giving approval.  They don't sound very good according to this article.  I see  the $78 million benefits package that encouraged so many DC groups to testify in favor of the Exelon takeover would now be kept "in escrow until it can be determined how best to spend it, and removing a requirement that the company develop microgrids in the District."  This ensures that the many DC groups who expected a payout for their support will now have to BEG the Mayor and others for their payoff.

It also means that the Federal Govt.'s folks at GSA who thought they had a deal with the Mayor through Tommy Wells are also sxxxxed.  Since the Feds use 1/3rd the electricity in DC, perhaps they will reactivate their objections.  Where are all those nosy Congresspeople when their DC control might actually be useful.  I would also like to know the size of our DC Govt. electric bill?  Is our Mayor also doing it to the taxpayers in addition to the ratepayers given the likely rate increases to DC Govt. under Exelon?
  
     This hearing was a fascinating study in how huge business spends their money to mobilize support and destroy the efforts of "We the People."  The PSC will probably make their final ruling some time in March (see above), so we have time to mobilize more effort to stop Exelon.  In fact, the PSC will accept letters regarding the Exelon takeover until Dec. 23rd.  One thing I had not realized before doing research for this Community Hearing, was how desperate Exelon was to save themselves at our expense.  It seems they are making some halfhearted efforts to increase their portfolio of renewables, but their overload of nuclear is truly a rotting albatross around their necks.  [President Obama has just recognized the need for earthquake protection with an Executive Order aimed at protecting government buildings.]

Pepco has been busy trying to sell this buyout (it is not a merger).  Pepco stockholders will receive $27.25 per share of Pepco paid by Exelon.  They will receive NO Exelon stock.  In addition the CEO of Pepco will receive $10 million, and $30 million total will be paid to top Pepco executives.  In addition, Mayor Bowser's favorite staffer will receive a guaranteed buyout of more than $1 million  in Pepco stock.  There are also a number of other good reasons for not approving this buyout.  The following protection was eliminated over a decade ago.  Now we see the results.  The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 placed restrictions on utility holding companies in order to protect ratepayers against the holding-company excesses that contributed to the Great Depression.  

By all means read the first three links below my current testimony.  The fourth link is my previous blog article on this struggle against Exelon/PEPCO.  The saddest thing to see was the score or more of apparently low income people wearing identical green T-shirts, green hats, and carrying large printed pro Exelon signs.  Several of us heard that they were being paid at least $15 to show up and sit in the audience.  Sadly, in 10 years most of them will be unable to afford to live in DC.  If you know more about this, please post a comment with details.

A second piece of trickery was the treatment of the public as compared to the paid audience members.  Two people have told me how they and a number of others were detained in the lobby instead of being allowed upstairs.  Thus while paid pro-Exelon people were allowed into the hearing, the general public including anti-Exelon ratepayers were kept out.  One person, a listed witness, was allowed upstairs and reported back that there was plenty of seating in the hearing room for those kept out in the lobby.  Please comment if you were among the victims detained in the lobby.

A third piece of funny business was the fact that a single individual phoned in a list of almost 70 names of potential witnesses.  Apparently PSC made NO EFFORT to vet this individual.  They were numbered starting from 150.  You will note they are alphabetical by FIRST name, odd in itself.  The Tuesday hearing was ended a little after 4:30 pm at number 118.  The total list was 259 names.  Wednesday at lunch time I dropped in at PSC to listen to more testimony.  Discovered they were finished around 12:30.  Someone who had been there the whole time said that when all those people, whose names were called in by ONE person, were called on to testify, NOT A SINGLE ONE responded. 

I wonder how the PSC felt about having their time wasted like that?  How do you feel about having your money wasted that way on their salaries.  Let's try to calculate it:  Salary wasted by someone recording the 70 names, someone typing up the 70 names, the 13 extra pages the names were printed on, the paper wasted printing all these extra pages, 3 commissioners and 10 or more staff salaries as they sat through the reading of these 13 pages.  Does this add up to enough for a grand larceny charge.  If not criminal, could we sue for civil damages and punitive damages for wasting our tax money?  WHO MADE THAT CALL???  If you know, please add a comment.

The harmful result of that trickery is that people who thought they could testify after those individuals did not even arrive before the hearings were shut down.  Here is one outraged comment:  "Even more of a problem is that the additional names, who probably never intended to testify, were accepted onto the list by the Secty of the PSC without verification from those individuals. The result of allowing all these false names, I was placed at number 2XX.  I didn't think they would get to me until after 1pm today, actually figuring closer to 5pm.  I got there at 1:45pm and it was over.  The false ballooning of the list messed any real understanding of a schedule and prevented me [and probably others] from testifying.  I don't understand why this was even allowed to happen."  I think we can all understand that this is how Exelon operates and is a dismal portent of our future relations with them.

The suspicious names start at number 150 and run to 216.  Do you recognize what group, Ward, etc. these names might have been culled from?  Did the individual making the call to PSC even have permission to use their names?  If not, would they want to sue?  Here is the link for all the PSC witnesses.  Below that is a much more compact link I edited.  Since I can't get a URL from Libre Office I am posting this condensed list as a separate blog post.
http://dcpsc.org/pdf_files/hottopics/FC1119_ListofSpeakers.pdf
http://gleeaikin.blogspot.com/2015/11/dc-psc-community-hearing-witness-list.html

[12/2/15] - Today the PSC held the hearing for the participants in the deal, Exelon, PEPCO and others.  One disappointment, the federal government's General Services Admin. which had previously questioned Exelon sharply over their effect on federal government electrical costs, and thus the taxpayers dollars, decided to sit this one out according to this report.  This may have happened because the GSA wanted DC's help with an energy project., reports the Washington Post.  To quote Tommy Wells, currently DC Director of Energy & Environment, and negotiator for Mayor Bowser, "I told them, we could prioritize you (GSA) for one of these microgrids...I do think they would be interested in that...We are very interested in helping."

[12/5/15] - A lively demonstration against Exelon/PEPCO was held outside PSC's building and reported on the noon news on the 2nd.   Exelon stock continued to decline in value as the afternoon progressed.  Now, 3 days later, Exelon stock fell even further on Friday as the general market rose.  In addition it appears the the GSA wanted more time to formulate its response.  So perhaps there is time to get Congress involved to keep the federal government from paying excessive electric rates.

[12/7/15] - Four courageous DC Council members have submitted a heavily footnoted letter to the PSC describing the many reasons PSC should continue to deny approval of this merger.  Among other things Mary Cheh, David Grosso, Elissa Silverman, and Charles Allen point out that compared with likely profits of $100 million a year, the one time payments of less than $80 million to city and ratepayers is a bargain.  They also explain that a number of these payments to DC will merely replace money that would have been spent anyway, leaving those funds to be spent in unknown ways.

[12/8/15] - Exelon/Pepco hired the Howard Theater and provided a catered sideboard to all who attended their "Town Hall" on this merger/takeover.  They also put a green shopping bag containing a green hat and a green water bottle, all printed with pro Exelon advertising under every seat.  They plan to hold these events throughout the city.  The next day, at a Ward 4 monthly ANC meeting, the elected members voted unanimously to continue to oppose this takeover.  Glad some of our elected public servants have not yet been bought.

[12/16/15] - An article from WAMU confirms that in late September payments were made by Exelon to the Chairman of Fresh-PAC, a group formed to collect campaign money in support of Muriel Bowser.  The goal was to encourage these people to lobby the Mayor to support Exelon.  A few days later Mayor Bowser switched her support to Exelon. This PAC which received a lot of criticism has now been ended, and funds are being returned.  Other interesting articles are linked at the end.

[12/18/15] - The federal General Services Administration has now reversed its former stance on this buyout.  They now complain that it is unfair that they as the largest electricity user in the city and other commercial users get no benefits like small ratepayers.  Time will tell if they are also bought off by sweetheart deals that will cost taxpayers instead of ratepayers.  Meanwhile Exelon continues to spend large amounts of money to mail cards, pay for ads, robocalls, and other means of persuading the public that they are a good thing.  This Washington Post article also has interesting comments.

The witnesses fell into several categories:
1) Con.  People who had deep inside knowledge of how the nuclear industry and Exelon are operating, such as a former TVA executive, were uniformly against.
2) Pro.  Local organizations who have been getting PEPCO money, and are told they will get Exelon money were uniformly in favor.  Apparently $79 million which our government should probably mostly be paying anyway is hard to compare with a $multibillion bill for an accident or shutting down 1 or more Exelon nuclear plants.
3) Pro.  Individuals who think that PEPCO is so bad, that surely a much larger business based in Chicago will give them better and quicker service.
4) Con.  Political activists who have consistently fought the big money giveaways by bought and paid for elected politicians, and see more big payoffs resulting in forcing the poor out of DC, and impoverishing the elderly and middle class as well.

If after reading these testimonies you agree that Exelon takeover is bad for us, study the lists available above and call those you may know and convince them to also come out against this sell-out.  I find it particularly hard to understand why businesses would imagine that higher electric bills will be good for their bottom line.


DC Public Service Commission Community Hearing, 
Formal Case 1119
November 17 & 18, 2015, 10 am to 7 pm,
1325 G St., NW, Room 800, Washington, DC 20005

Testimony by G. Lee Aikin, 54 year DC Resident
DC Statehood Green Party

Thank you for hearing our many voices today. I previously reported to you my concerns regarding potential earthquake danger to Exelon's 23 nuclear plants. Since the 5.8 earthquake in Mineral, VA, there have continued to be small local quakes. In addition to owning Three Mile Island, Exelon now has interests in the Calvert Cliffs nuclear plants. Please be sure to check the earthquake standard for each plant that DC rate payers would help pay for should the worst happen as it did in Japan. North Anna, VA was built to a 6.0 standard, not a very comfortable margin to the 5.8 quake that did strike. It cost Three Mile Island more than $1 billion to clean up in the 1970s and 1980s. Far more in today's dollars.  [A witness in favor of Exelon said they need their payoff to repair earthquake damage at Carter Barron.  President Obama has just recognized the need for earthquake protection with an Executive Order.]

Today I want to call your attention to the aging nature of the Exelon stable of nuclear plants. It has been stated it could cost $1 billion to shut down a nuclear plant. Two hundred (200) nuclear reactors are slated to be shut down by 2040 which could cost more than $100 billion for decommissioning costs. The International Energy Agency (IEA) warns there are “considerable uncertainties” about these costs. Governments have limited experience with this as only 10 plants were decommissioned in the past 40 years. {1}

Looking at one specific example we find the San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant in Southern California. Because of premature wear on important parts, in June, 2013, the complete closure of the plant was announced, to begin in early 2016. The Nuclear regulatory Commission believes this process will take around 20 years costing $4.4 billion. Do you really want to risk subjecting us all to those kinds of costs? {1}

Much credit is given by the nuclear folks to the lack of air pollution compared with coal, oil, and gas. However, a major issue facing decommissioning is storage of nuclear waste left behind by the plant. With so many plants about to be decommissioned, this will become a key issue. Most states won't allow these environmentally hazardous nuclear waste products. {1}

In Illinois, Exelon has warned they would have to close 3 nuclear plants “unless consumers chip in to reward them for producing environmentally-friendly electricity.” Recently introduced Illinois legislation “would create a financial reward for generators that produce 'clean' energy which doesn't create harmful greenhouse gases.” The ratepayers would finance it. {2} Apparently they don't want to acknowledge the environmental danger and cost of spent nuclear fuel. Do we really want to be under the thumb of a company which is already coercing the Illinois legislature to finance its uneconomic business model?

In the US, four reactors were permanently closed in 2013. “A glut of shale gas, government-subsidized wind power and slack demand slashed power prices more than 40% since 2008, making it hard to justify costly-repairs or continued operations of aging nuclear units.” “Given current economics with natural gas prices, it is very hard for nuclear to compete,” said Philip Smyth, a power analyst with Fitch Ratings.” {3}

Exelon's Clinton facility in Illinois is among nuclear generators that may be shut down from either political or financial pressure.” “Exelon...underperformed the S&P Utility Index in the past 5 years....and has seen stock prices fall since July 2008 [to 2013] by 62%.” In 2013 “Exelon was forced to cut its quarterly dividend for the first time amid falling electricity prices...” Meanwhile, Exelon has “projected about $900 million in additional cost for their reactors from new Fukushima-related safety rules over the next 6 years [starting 2013] according to regulatory filings.” {3} Why on earth would you want us to pay for that?

Exelon has 11 of its nuclear plants in Illinois, licenses for 7 of them are expiring in from 7 to 12 years. When do their other 12 nuclear plant licenses expire? No wonder they want to own our DC rate payers. {4}

ILLINOIS
Braidwood 1 Exelon    October 17, 2026
Braidwood 2 Exelon    December 18, 2027
Byron 1 Exelon    October 31, 2024
Byron 2 Exelon    November 6, 2026
Clinton Exelon    September 29, 2026
Dresden 2 Exelon    December 22, 2029
Dresden 3 Exelon    January 12, 2031
La Salle County 1 Exelon    April 17, 2022
La Salle County 2 Exelon    December 16, 2023
Quad Cities 1 Exelon    December 14, 2032
Quad Cities 2 Exelon    December 14, 2032
Clinton* Exelon    Proposed



Please don't allow us all to become victims of Exelon's corporate strategy and need to keep its stockholders happy. Your duty is to protect us the residents of Washington, DC.



{3} http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-07-21/nuclear-closures-at-entergy-to-exelon-seen-on-obama-plan

{4} http://gleeaikin.blogspot.com/2015/01/exelonpepco-merger-is-it-good-for-dc.html


The two stock market charts below from Market Watch explain their fear.  The numbers on the right side are the dollar value of the shares.  In mid 2008 stock was worth $90 per share.  This Friday (11-19-15) their shares were worth $28 each, as the second chart shows.  Their stockholders must be spitting bullets at management.

[For some reason these two charts are not printing from the draft to the published article.  However, clicking the 2 blue links in the explanations brings them up.]























Here is a chart of the past 15 years of Exelon stock market activity.  They trade under the symbol EXC.  Note their value dropped quickly with the beginning of Obama administration, and even more after the fears raised in {3} article above.


Below is a chart of Exelon's last 10 days of market activity.  Note how the value dropped sharply during the first day of the PSC hearing, but rose again during the second day, but on Thursday  trended downward again.  The part of the chart labeled "Volume" means the number of shares bought and sold each day and with this chart by the hour. When you click the 10 day link you get today's figure.  You also have the option there of asking for a chart of more or less day's activity.  Today, 11/20/15 the value has dropped to the low point on Tuesday.  Don't give up, we can still win.




See this March 2015 article from the Baltimore Sun regarding problems related to Exelon's move into this region and difference in the various regional utilities.  This article from Public Citizen has more than a dozen Exelon related links.

Here is additional information regarding earthquake potential in the eastern United States.  We really need to make sure that the PSC thinks this issue through carefully.  In addition, they need to heed the warning of the 7 staff members of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission who have petitioned their bosses to have serious electrical problems in almost every reactor fixed immediately, or else shut these reactors down.


Joyce Robinson-Paul, Consumer Utility Board (Ward 5)
Testimony before the Public Service Commission, Community Hearing, Exelon-Pepco Settlement Proposal for Formal Case No 1119 
Tuesday, November 17, 2015 
Good Afternoon: This will be my 30th year coming before the Public Service Commission as a past and present member of the Consumer Utility Board(CUB).  First, I would like to thank the Office of the People's Counsel for their assistance over the years in providing the public with transparent information concerning utility issues. I would also like to thank the Public Service Commission for providing this community hearing after agreeing that Formal Case No. 1119 Merger was not in the Public Interest of the District of Columbia.  
Pepco has fallen short of providing reliable service to the customers of the District of Columbia after many years of promising to do so.  Why would we trust Exelon, whose main headquarters is in Chicago, who only agrees to co-locate for at least ten years to provide reliable, affordable service?  The greatest beneficiaries of this settlement are Pepco's President, Joe Rigby, who will receive $10.1 million compensation, and five others, who will receive $30.1 million in bonuses!  The $5.2 million to the District to support workforce development programs will be given to the Department of Employment Services and UDC. However, there is no guarantee this will be used exclusively for residents of the District of Columbia to acquire and obtains jobs at Exelon. 
The biggest Benefit is to Pepco Holdings shareholders, who will receive 50% over the book value and about 25% over the market value per share. This will cause Exelon shareholders, to become a bigger company.  The big question is: What happens before and after 2019 (five years down the road)?  The city can't continue to let developers and corporations create mass homelessness.  Everyone is aware that the government already has been unsuccessful finding housing for the current homeless population.  Will seniors who are paying over 50% of their housing cost for utilities, which, include increasing water and sewer costs, and increased tax assessment costs be priced out of DC?. 
Electric is a basic need, why would any settlement put low and moderate income residents in a balloon note situation in five years. Residents have a right to affordable electric in our homes?  Electric is a basic need, unlike a phone which can be shut off, if the price gets too costly for your income.  Many of the seniors who are homeowners will be gentrified out of D.C.  Is the plan for only the rich to live in Washington, DC. after five years?  These are the residents who stayed and payed, when many people left the city for the suburbs.  After five years is the plan to displace them because they are on a fixed retirement income?   
Low and Moderate Income Senior citizens and working poor are like the Man in the Middle . They earn too much to qualify for the Low Income Energy Assistance Program and too little to keep up with the greedy monopolies.  Why should this or any settlement place Senior Citizens in jeopardy of mass displacement in 2019?  How can we let a Major monopoly like Exelon come here and cause mass displacement of our residents?  Just because the Mayor agrees and the government says it's a settlement, doesn't mean it is.  Will greed and a pay-to-play system continue in DC.  Most citizens, including you, must all agree that this settlement is not acceptable.  It is a rip-off of DC's vulnerable citizens, and every elected official will be paid by PEPCO at election time. The pay-off should be to VOTE this administration out of office.  SWEEP the officials out the door. 
SUMMATION:  There are very few tangible benefits for the ratepayers.  PEPCO's improved electric service reliability sucks; however, they will be paid over $30.1 million in benefits.  Promoting rate affordability, including affordable housing is the big joke in DC.  It is the biggest lie ever told.  As long as greed prevails over needs, this city's elected officials will go down as the disgraceful home rulers, who turned on their taxpayers and voters who believed they could make a difference.  This settlement does not address jobs for D.C. residents.  It only gives more money to the various agencies that will continue business as usual.  The millions that are given to non-profits should be put in a full to help senior citizens stay in their homes.  If $6.75 million can be implemented in multi-family and master metered apartments, the same amount should be placed in a fund to help seniors stay in their homes.   
The Solar Interconnection process should be shortened to two months or a fine assessed to PEPCO.  At least $5 million should be available to OPC to promote Energy Efficiency programs and services.  The $5 million loan to the District government for development of renewable energy programs should be a grant.  This can be accomplished by reducing the compensation and bonuses to PEPCO Executives.  Over $15 million should go to the Low Income Energy Assistance Program, so that low income residents receive funds all year long.   $1 million should be provided to forgive low income families accounts.   
The CUB requests that:  *Both OPC and the PSC closely monitor settlement agreement benefits to make sure DC ratepayers receive real benefits in a timely manner.  *That PSC level the maximum financial penalties for delays and or missed deadline for those purported benefits to DC Consumers.  *That the PSC agree to hold status meetings twice a year starting in 2016 to update the public as it relates to the settlement agreement benefits achieved.  *PSC require additional quality of service standards that would make sure the new company expands its call center in DC to limit wait time in talking to a  representatives within 8 to 10 minutes, and *Would like the OPC to hold four community information sessions in each quadrant of the city to update residents on both the undergrounding project and status of the purported benefits from the merger/takeover. * Have the company dedicate at least 3 staff to work on senior issues as dedicated phone lines.  *Have the utility work with both AARP, DC Office of Aging and the Department of Human Service to identify seniors living alone or in trouble with their high utility cost.  *OPC and the PSC should coordinate with the committee to have an oversight hearing on what is not working. 
This message is from IPADDRESS: 164.82.32.13
Referrer: http://www.dcpsc.org/contactus/contactus.asp 

Here is a subsequent letter from Joyce Robinson-Paul to the Public Service Commission prior to their Dec. 23, 2015 deadline for public comment:

[Pending receipt of transferable copy.]
Subsequent to this testimony, we find that others besides PEPCO executives will profit from this takeover in the $million plus range.  One of Mayor Bowser's chief aides stands to profit big time,  as the Washington Post explains.  In addition the Washington Post also describes the call for an ethics investigation of Mayor Bower by opponents of this potentially costly merger.  Furthermore, another WP article details the position several Council members have taken against the reappointment to head of the Office of the People's Counsel.  The OPC (which is charged with protecting consumers from utility excess) had initially strongly opposed this merger.  Then after OPC was suddenly friendly to the takeover,  Mayor Bowser approved her reappointment,.  Wow, Washington Post, thanks a bundle!!


From: David Schwartzman <dschwartzman@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 5:41 PM
Subject: My written testimony
To: "PSC - Commission Secretary (PSC)" <Psc-CommissionSecretary@dc.gov>

Re: Exelon-Pepco Merger proposal

For the reasons outlined in Power DC’s powerful critique of the proposed takeover of Pepco by Exelon now being reconsidered by the Public Service Commission (PSC), the PSC should not accept the Mayor’s deal with Exelon, and any such a merger with Pepco, in other words stand by its original decision.  In addition, such a takeover of Pepco by Exelon would be a serious assault on the vision and goals of Sustainable DC, in particular its commitment to curbing carbon emissions in the face of ever closer tipping points to catastrophic climate change. Achieving this goal will require rapid replacement of fossil fuel dependence for energy delivery by wind and solar power. 

Exelon has demonstrated its unwelcome agenda of resisting this transition to renewable energy supplies, e.g., by its close alliance with the Edison Electric Institute (Exelon CEO Chris Crain is Vice Chairman of the Edison Electric Institute), which actively collaborates with ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council. ALEC is a right-wing national group pushing a legislative agenda for voter disenfranchisement/suppression, particularly targeted against the African-American, Hispanic and the low-income electorate, as well as the removal of subsidies for wind/solar power development.  I provided relevant documentation on these facts in my testimony to the PSC on December 17, 2014. Given the Exelon/ALEC collaboration, our Mayor’s promotion of the Exelon takeover is very disturbing, but not entirely surprising in light of the Federal City Council’s (FCC) support, which has long set the agenda for our local elected politicians.

Note the following, as well as the dozens of full page ads in the Washington Post and other local newspapers supporting the Mayor’s deal with Exelon:  ‘The utilities and their supporters, spearheaded by the Federal City Council and its chief executive, former D.C. mayor Anthony A. Williams, mounted a campaign that delivered strong support for the deal from the business, philanthropic and political communities. “We applauded the hard-fought settlement negotiated by Mayor Bowser as a good deal,” Williams’s office said in an e-mail. “There is a wave of support with the majority of the D.C. Council and many original opponents of the merger now behind the settlement. This decision by the PSC is another step in the right direction.”’ (https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/capitalbusiness/exelon-bid-to-buy-pepco-gets-boost/2015/10/28/c76353a8-7d83-11e5-beba-927fd8634498_story.html). 

It is clear the FCC has put its heavy weight of influence and corporate funding behind this unwelcome deal, including its familiar use of “trickle down” economics to further its goals, with numerous non-profits so dependent for their funding being bought off without consideration of the real interests of the community they pretend to serve.

It is high time that our local elected government and the PSC begin resisting the lobbyists and agenda of the FCC (http://www.federalcitycouncil.org/which has contributed significantly to the high income inequality and insecurity as well as poverty in the District over the last few decades. The FCC has long represented the interests of the big corporate/banking sector at the expense of the quality of life for our residents, and in this case our children’s future in face of dangerous climate change. The PSC should resist the corruption of our democracy by the big corporate sector undermining the popular will against this takeover expressed by ANC resolutions prior to the original decision, and the voices heard by letters and in the public hearings this coming week.  Say no to Exelon!

David Schwartzman (Professor Emeritus, Howard University) 
DC Statehood Green Partydschwartzman@gmail.com202-829-9063 

This was submitted as written testimony as Dr. Schwartzman was not in town.  There is still time for people to submit written testimony to:  psc-commissionsecretary@dc.gov.

DC PSC Community Hearing Witness List for 11-17 & 18, 2015 Hearing (condensed) & 67 fake? names

The original PSC list was a total of 51 pages, and a tremendous waste of paper.  I condensed it to 13 pages with a space between each name for taking notes.  I presume the PSC list format was used to discourage getting copies made and using them for notetaking.  See link.
http://dcpsc.org/pdf_files/hottopics/FC1119_ListofSpeakers.pdf

However, you now have this much easier to use list.  Almost all the businesses, most of the charitable organizations, and the Hispanic community groups favored Exelon.  Apparently one time payments totaling almost $40 million will buy a lot of good press.  Unfortunate the businesses, organizations, and Hispanic people who will have to pay the much increased utility bills in a few years.  Use this list to find organizations you can lobby to change their support to keeping Pepco, flawed as it is, rather than taking the Devil you don't know.

THIS JUST IN:  [2/26/16]  The Public Service Commission has just voted 2 to 1 to ask some changes of  Exelon prior to giving approval.  They don't sound very good according to this article.  I see  the $78 million benefits package that encouraged so many DC groups to testify in favor of the Exelon takeover would now be kept "in escrow until it can be determined how best to spend it, and removing a requirement that the company develop micro-grids in the District."  This ensures that the many DC groups who expected a payout for their support will now have to BEG the Mayor and others for their payoff.  It also means the guy at the Feds GSA made a bad decision on micro-grids.

[11/17/15 – I testified this day and noticed that from #152 to #218, the witnesses were listed alphabetically by first names. I asked a PSC staffer if they knew why this was done. They said one person had phoned in giving them 70 names to add to the witness list. Weird??? There were also a dozen+ people sitting all day who had been paid $15 and given green shirts, hats and printed pro Exelon signs. People who did not make it to the Tuesday hearing will be allowed to speak on Wednesday.  [or not as it turned out]  I condensed the sprawling 51 page PSC witness list here. Testimony was ended at 4:40 pm. Wednesday will begin with #119. G. Lee Aikin, DC Statehood Green Party]

[11/18/15 - Since the Tuesday hearing was stopped at number 118, I decided to go there at lunchtime and listen to some more testimony.  The hearing had just been ended around 12:30.  Apparently NOT ONE of the 70 names added by 1 person had responded, so others scheduled after them were deprived of the opportunity to speak if they did not come very early.  I have spoken to several who are furious about this trickery.  Not  weird after all, just nasty big business.  Perhaps a foretaste of how Exelon will treat us as customers.  See this post of testimony and Exelon problems for detailed information.  Do you recognize any of the names between #152 and#218.  Can you guess who might have played this trick on us?  Please Comment or email me at gleeaikin@yahoo.com.

Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia Community Hearing
Formal Case 1119
List of Speakers (Pre-Registered) Date: November 17-18, 2015 Time: 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Location: Hearing Room, Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia
1325 G Street, NW, 8th Floor Washington, DC 20005
Headings:  NAME, ADDRESS, TELEPHONE NUMBER, REPRESENTING SELF or COMPANY, HOW CONTACTED, SPECIAL NEEDS NOTES (almost NO addresses or phone numbers are listed)

1. David Jonas Bardin SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

2. Robert Vinson Brannum SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

3. John Capozzi SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

4. John Thomson SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

5. John Mcgregor Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

6. Ivan Frishberg Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

7. Robert & Sherrill Berger SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

8. Kathy E. Hollinger Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

9. Edmund Fleet, Building Bridges across the River, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

10. Anthony Williams, Federal City Council, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

11. Marchant Wentworth, Wentworth Green Strategies Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

12. Joseph Persichini, Jr., Washington DC Police Foundation, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

13. John Enzler, Yes No If Yes, Explain Mr. Enzler’s assistant called on 11-10-15 to inform us that he will not be able to make it and will submit written testimony. Kemi Morten will take his place. Kemi Morten Alliance

Page 2

14. Emily Stiever SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

15. Keshini Ladduwahetty, DC for Democracy Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

16. Tim Judson, NRIS, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

17. Allison Archambault SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

18. Lynn Mento SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

19. Monroe Harrison SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

20. Diane D’Arrigo SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

21. Antonio Francis SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

22. Keith Sellars SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

23. George H. Lambert, The Greater Washington Urban League, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

24. Joe Andronaco Access Green Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

25. Allison Fisher SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

26. Anthony Cancelosi SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

27. Elana Orbuch, AVODAH: The Jewish Service Corps Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

28. Pat Bahn Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

29. John Chelen Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

30. Rev. Kip Banks, East Washington Heights Baptist Church, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

31. Mike Ewall, Energy Justice Network, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

32. Sarah Saylor Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

33. Samuel Jordan SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

34. Andrea Molod Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

Page 3

35. Meta Renee Williams, J.D. Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

36. Mary C. Young, ANC3B04, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

37. Tamara Smith, YWCA National Capital Area, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

38. Mykiel Rausu-Bey SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

39. Dale Bannon, The Salvation Army, If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

40. Johnnie Rice SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

41. Pat Bahn SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

42. Kirby Vining SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

43. Deborah Shore Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

44. Joyce Robinson-Paul Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

45. Mary Beth O'Quinn SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

46. Marcia Rucker SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

47. Renee Bowser, ANC 4D02, Commissioner ANC 4D, Vice Chair ANC 4D, Yes No If Yes, Explain Ms. Bowser would like to give her testimony on Wednesday, November 18, 2015.

48. Eric L. Evans, 100 Black Men Of Greater Washington, D.C. Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message [also listed as #150]

49. Jesse Lovell SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

50. Arrington Dixon, ADA, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

51. Glen O’Gilvie, Center for Nonprofit Advancement, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

52. George Fenderson SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

53. Pedro Alfonso, Dynamic Concepts, Inc., Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

54. Shavon Smith SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

55. Bonnie Fogel, Imagination Stage, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message
Page 4

56. Anthony Dinkins SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

57. Matthias Paustian SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

58. Charles Shipp SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

59. Armentha Mike Cruise, Aspen Group Inc., Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

60. Shelore Ann Williams SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

61. Yvonne M. Rice SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

62. Janice H. Davis, SELF/Davis & Davis, Inc. ,Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

63. Gloria Hightower, Friends of Carter Barron, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

64. Harry Wingo, DC Chamber of Commerce, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

65. Nina Dodge SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

66. Shilpa Joshi SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

67. Dr. Karl Reid Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

68. Angela Franco, Greater Washington Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

69. Dr. Karl Reid Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

70. Leotha Woodson, Noah’s Arc, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

71. Sylvia Ryan, Noah’s Arc, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

72. Bernadette Harvey, BCONSTRUX, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

73. Dr. E. Faye Williams, National Conference of Black Women, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

74. Andrea Rosen SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

75. Tania Miller SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

Page 5

76. Albrette “Gigi” Ransom SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

77. Martin Harwit SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

78. Richard Lee SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

79. Melanie Coburn SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

80. Tania Miller SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

81. London Thomas SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

82. David Freeman Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

83. Camelia Mazard SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

84. Adrian Ganio SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

85. G. Lee Aikin, DC Statehood Green Party, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

86. Maria Patricia Corrales, Capital Construction, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

87. Dr. Eileen CrawfordTaylor SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

88. Sheila Reid, Avanti Realty, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

89. Nick Reid, Avanti Realty, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

90. Tanya Hinton, Culture DC, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

91. Terry Lee SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

92. Marqus Bigelow SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

93. Samuel Batts SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

94. Bernice Rink SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

95. Alberta Gaskins SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

96. Allen Burris Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

97. Dr. Sheila Brooks Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

98. Charles Brown, Jr. Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message
Page 6

99. Beverly Short Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

100. D. Morris Michael, D. Morris Michael, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

101. James J. Fournier, Esq., James J. Fournier, Esq., Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

102. Laurence E. Jackson, Ph.D., Laurence E. Jackson, Ph.D., Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

103. David Arkush Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

104. Talib I. Karim, STEM4US, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

105. Winifred Y. Carson-Smith Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

106. Lennette Watts Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

107. Sean Cahill, DC Building Industry Association, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

108. Rod Woodson, DC Building Industry Association, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

109. Sheila H. Westfield, The Greater Washington Urban League, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

110. James Riley, McGrit Project Learning Tree, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

111. [no name listed] SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

112. Nathaniel Catlett Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

113. Earl Sullivan SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

114. Sam Tramal, DC Children’s Trust Fund, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

115. James Cooke Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

116. William J. Snape, III Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

117. Keith Silver SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

118. Timothy Shaw SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message
Page 7

119. Patricia Gomillion SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

120. Leona Redmond, Wesley House Resident Council, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

121. Monique Sullivan SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

122. Gloria Murchison SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

123. Francis Prophet SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

124. Dahfon Williams SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

125. Brenda Wells SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

126. Sabrina Stephens Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

127. Andre Lee Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

128. Debra Quartermaine Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

129. Rev. Dr. Crawford Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

130. Jay Johnson Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

131. Victor Coclough Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

132. Earl Sullivan Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

133. Debby Hanrahan SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

134. Mark Davis, WDC Solar, Inc., Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

135. Brenda Devrouax, Pepco, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

136. [no listing]

137. Jim Dinegar, Greater Washington, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

138. Charles Gaither SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

139. Earl Fowlkes SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

140. Jennifer Tucker SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

141. Michael Beale SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message
Page 8

142. Aaron McCormick SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

143. Danita Doleman, Seas Community Partners, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

144. Kassahun Tefera, Metro Lab DC, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

145. Nathan Groce SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

146. Lavinia Wohlfarth SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

147. Milton Morris, MDM Office Systems, If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

148. Kendrick Richardson, RDS Architecture, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

149. Basav Sev, Green Neighbors, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

150. Eric Evans, The One Hundred Black Men of Greater Washington, DC, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message [also listed as #48]

151. Geraldine Bell, Parkside Civic Association, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

Alphabetized list by first name of witnesses starts here and ends at 218. Who sent this list???

152. Adrian Gaino SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

153. Almandeus Thornton SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

154. Andree Lee SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

155. Anthony Reeves SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

156. Anthony Reeves, Sr. SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

157. Anthony Shorts SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

158. Ayana Mayberry SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

159. Beniya Valentine SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

160. Bennie Lawson SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

161. Betty Hodges SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

Page 9

162. Carmen Robles-Inman SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

163. Carolyn Mitchell Bell SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

164. Carolyn Woods SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

165. Casten Manley SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

166. Cecelia Thorne SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

167. Celia Barnes SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

168. Christopher Parler SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

169. Clifford Thorne SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

170. Dantes Augustin SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

171. Darmaine Clark SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

172. David Boyd SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

173. David Johnson SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

174. Dena Walker SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

175. Denise Barner SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

176. Diane Barnes SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

177. Diane Wilks SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

178. Donovan Harris SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

179. Dr. Bill Hassan SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

180. Duane Wilson SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

181. Eddy Varona SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

182. Evelyn Rodgers SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

183. Frank Malone SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

184. Fred Lockett SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

185. Gloria Dade SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message
Page 10

186. Herbert Briscoe SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

187. Jessica Thomas SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

188. JoAnn Johnson SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

189. Keera Cunningham SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

190. Keeta Watts SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

191. Keith Dickinson SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

192. Kim Wood SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

193. Kindra Beamon SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

194. Kurt Adams SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

195. Leon Samuels, Jr. SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

196. Lonnie Beamon SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

197. Margaret Winston SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

198. Margaret Harison SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

199. Nathan Perkins SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

200. Paul Cook SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

201. Phillip Cunningham, Jr. SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

202. Phillip Cunningham, Sr. SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

203. Rev. Michael Bell, Sr. SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

204. Rev. Robert Childs SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

205. Rosa Hightower SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

206. Ruby Perry SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

207. Saul Watts SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

208. Scotty Foxx SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

209. Sean Metcalf SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message
Page 11

210. Sequing Johnson SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

211. Sharon Valentine SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

212. Sheresse Baltimore SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

213. Stacy Banks SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

214. Symone Dickens SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

215. Terry Goins SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

216. Von Davenport SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

217. Willie Delaney Barg SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

118. Yvonne Coleman SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

219. Michael Sindram SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message


[11/16/15 - Tuesday evening I will report to my contacts what I saw at the Hearing. If names have been added to this witness list, I will try to condense and distribute that information as well.
G. Lee Aikin, DC Statehood Green Party]

PSC has updated the list and it is now 51 pages instead of 43. The numbering has changed too, and I will start with Michael Sindram who is now 217.

217. Michael Sindram SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

218. Leotha Woodson, Noah’s Arc, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

219. Sylvia Ryan, Noah’s Arc, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

220. Gilbert Campbell Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

221. Radindranauth (Rad) Ranson SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

222. Jacques Kapuscinski SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

223. Caroline Petti Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

224. Jessica Champagne Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

225. William (Billy) Eric Sahm Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

Page 12

226. Pandit Wright, The Boys and Girls Club of Greater Washington, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

227. Dale Doucette Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

228. Stuart Cameron Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

229. Evanna Powell Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

230. Chris Otten, DC For a Reasonable Development, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

231. Kendrick Richardson Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

232. Shireen Parsons SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

233. Benjamin King SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

234. Benton Murphy, The Community Foundation for the National Capital Region, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

235. Lynn Raskin, Climate Change Literacy, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

236. Kevin Kamps Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

237. Barrett Ware Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

238. Mark Jones, M. Jones Companies & National Business League, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

239. Melvin Hines, S.E. Restaurant Group, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

240. Mark McDonald, Minority Business Economic Council, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

241. Romaine B. Thomas, DC Office on Aging, Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

242. Ruth Kaplan SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

243. Frederic W. Schwartz, Jr. SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

244. Ross Schulman SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

Page 13

245. Elizabeth Berry SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

246. Mary Bolton Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

247. Larry Werner SELF Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

248. Peter Murtha Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

249. Joanna Spear Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

250. Jeffery Hargrave Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

251. Doug Duncan Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

252. Dasarath Kiridena Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

253. Anwar Saleem Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

254. Bob Andretta Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

255. Corey Griffin Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

256. Gwen Jackson Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

257. Harriet Pullman Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

258. John Thomas Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

259. Joigie Tolson Yes No If Yes, Explain Delivered Message Left Voicemail Message

[PSC, Page 51 of 51, My Page 13. a lot of trees saved]



Please use this to make notes of who is pro and who con (our position). Also good for seeing what organizations to lobby in the future to win over to the people's needs.