THE PROBLEM
In the 1990’s the international
community set goals for saving the world as we know it from
destruction by “greenhouse” gases and global warming. (Kyoto and
other agreements.) These goals are not being met. The destruction
of the vast tropical and subarctic forests through logging,
drought-enhanced fires, and insect infestation continues.
Antarctica, glaciers worldwide, and the polar ice cap are melting.
Petroleum and other non-renewable carbon-based fuels are being used
up. They become ever more expensive, hurting the poorer countries
catastrophically and leading to conflict and war in many parts of the
world.
Although much is said about the
need to reduce greenhouse gases produced by cars, trucks, ships,
planes, etc., all these forms of transportation cause only 25% of the
problem. Twice as significant is the 50% of greenhouse gases
produced by constructing, demolishing and maintaining
(heating/cooling) buildings and homes. Thus it is even more urgent
we find ways to reduce the pollution resulting from buildings .The
British estimate that post-construction building operations use 28%
of their national energy.
Our own desires for comfort and
convenience are reflected throughout the world. One point five
billion Chinese want to be warm in winter and cool in summer. A
billion Indians desperately need to be cool in summer as global
warming makes heat waves above 100 degrees f (38 degrees C) a
frequent occurrence. Even in the US, sustained high summer
temperatures have killed hundreds of people annually in recent years.
Solar technology, both active and
passive, can stop the burning of much fuel and save us from the
greenhouse gases and acid rain thereby produced. This information
has been fairly well publicized. Since manufacturers (at least in
developed countries) can make money by promoting active solar, this
technology will gain ever-increasing exposure. The same is true for
wind power as can be seen especially in Europe. British Petroleum
(BP) has already “seen the light” and is actively promoting their
Solar Division’s products. Several US oil companies have begun
work with alternative energy also.
We should be conserving as much
oil and coal as possible for their useful chemical properties. What
will we use for industrial chemicals a hundred years from now if we
empty the Alaskan National Wildlife Reserve’s petroleum deposits
now, instead of when we truly have an emergency? We must also reduce
our dependence on foreign oil and the potential political instability
thereby created. Recent development of US shale oil and gas deposits
has its own environmental problems. While China's potential to
develop such deposits may reduce their coal use, they have an
immediate air quality hazard.
What has not received so much
attention is the amazing potential of straw bale construction.
Strawbale (SB) homes, schools and other buildings can range from primitive to sophisticated futuristic architecture, but their production remains in the
hands of home owners (often the actual builders), farmers (the bale
producers), and architects (the designers of higher-end SB). Since
major corporations have fewer incentives to become involved in this
low profit activity, it is up to us, the people, to spread the word
and knowledge of this world-saving approach to home building. Here is another people based program which uses earth alone: http://calearth.org/ Combining some of their expertise using earth, with the strawbale approach could be very creative.
A SOLUTION
History – First let us
look at what strawbale construction is, and then at what could be
saved. Modern SB construction originated over 100 years ago in the
Sand Hills area of Nebraska which lacked timber but had quality hay.
Some buildings that age still exist. The recent invention of horse
or steam powered baling machines made possible good compressed hay or
straw for wire or string tied rectangular blocks called bales
(Modern bales are typically 2 or 3 string tied—polypropylene twine
is best—and roughly 36” x 18” x 14”, or 46” x 23” x
16”.) Nebraska settlers desperate for housing before severe
winters set in, would use the bales like giant bricks for temporary
walls, often resting pole and sod roofs directly on the bales. When
they discovered how comfortable these homes were in the extremes of
winter and summer, they were often plastered and adapted as permanent
dwellings. This “load-bearing” type, resting the roof supports
directly on the bales was the norm for decades.
Load-bearing construction is good
for one-story buildings, but in 1938 a mansion using 2,200
wheat-straw bales was built in Huntsville, Alabama. It is now the
Burritt Museum. While not quite futuristic architecture, this building was very advanced for it's day. This “non-loadbearing” type of building used the
infill bale technique in which a frame (often barn style post and
beam) and roof are built first and the bales set in the open spaces.
Two or more stories are possible with this second major type of bale
structure, but technical help with design and construction may be
needed.
There are also hybrid and other
methods for using bales in larger structures. Bales can be used to
retrofit commercial metal or pole-building kit structures, such as
farm sheds, warehouses and workshops. Other existing buildings can
be wrapped with bales, the roofs extended and doors and windows
modified. I have seen photos of advanced and even futuristic architecture used for expensive straw bale buildings. One such structure was built in the early 1990s for around $350,000 and sold 4 or 5 years later for double the price.
Benefits of Change –
Straw is the waste stems from harvested wheat, rice, rye, oats,
barley, etc. Unlike hay which is used for animal feed and has rodent
attracting seeds, straw is a waste product. It is hard to get rid of
except by burning causing greenhouse gases (carbon monoxide and
nitrous oxide), and health-harming air pollution. Rice straw with
its high silica content may be the worst. Rotting straw releases the
greenhouse gas methane. Some straw is useful for soil conditioning,
erosion control and animal bedding. Matts Myhrman says that if all
US post-harvest straw were baled, 5 million 2,000 sq. ft. homes could
be built annually (Annual conventional housing starts are about 1
million.)
In 1991 Calif. Agr. Mag.,
vol. 45, no. 4, compared annual carbon monoxide production in that
state by straw burning and power plants as follows:
Source of CO Tons Burned Tons CO Produced
Power plants 25,000
Rice straw 1,000,000 56,000
Wheat straw 97,000 5,000
As you can see, that year straw burning
produced more than twice as much CO as did power plants. A state
crackdown on burning may be helping, but there is still the disposal
problem. Ken Williams at a SB building seminar reported that
California produces enough straw per year to build 45,000 homes.
It boggles the mind to imagine how
many SB homes could be built of rice straw in China and Japan, or
wheat and rye straw in Russia, the central Asian steppes and parts of
Pakistan and north India. Simple adobe stucco can be hand applied
inside and out to finish the kind of small homes and farm buildings
that peasants and villagers might build. Thousands of lives in China
and Pakistan could have been saved from earthquakes if community
schools and homes had been built of strawbale instead of cement
blocks.
Fiberglass insulation ratings for
a standard wall of 2” x 4” studs is R-11, and for 2” x 6”
walls it is R-19. Walls of standard bales have about an R-50
insulation rating. If a sandwich roof with straw infill is used, the
R rating for the dwelling can be much higher—perhaps R-80 or R-90.
Thus, heating and cooling costs are lowered greatly. In less
developed countries forest destruction for both timber and firewood
would be vastly reduced. China is currently denuding South Asia and
Australia for timber. In densely populated areas health destroying
air pollution would be greatly lessened.
Other benefits include:
- The light weight of bales, their flexibility and ease of reinforcement with bamboo, metal, or wood pins provides excellent earthquake and hurricane resistance* and lifesaving potential compared with the heavy stone, adobe, or earth blocks used in 80% pf the world's homes.
- People, including women and children, are empowered and given pride by building something lasting that involves all their participation.
- In overpopulated river valleys far less scarce agricultural soil is needed for coating SB structures than for making solid adobe or earthen blocks.
- The dense walls block noise pollution, promoting tranquility and peace, especially beneficial in crowded communities, multi-unit buildings and windy lands.
- Farmers have reported that pigs and other animals are more tranquil and productive in SB structures.
- Use of plaster/stucco construction permits “painting” with incorporated dry natural pigments or whitewash, reducing use of toxic paints and solvents.
- Fast growing bamboo, common in many heavily populated countries can be used with SB for roofing and other structural purposes.
- Fewer or no toxic components results in a healthy house that “breathes”.
- Strawbale walls are bullet proof, sad but true.
CONCLUSION
Each of the above-mentioned
technologies—solar, wind power, and strawbale—if widely used—has
the potential to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
However, if solar or wind power were combined with SB structures, the
savings could be doubled, tripled or quadrupled.
By way of example, Spain has a
goal of producing 20% of national energy using wind power within 5
years. If Spain were to combine this power with significant use of
SB construction, perhaps wind power could provide 30 to 50% of
national energy needs.
After Hurricanes Katrina and
Rita, Americans are finally becoming aware of how interconnected the
world is where energy is concerned. We can see how energy use in
China and India with a combined population roughly eight times our
own is bound to greatly increase our energy costs, even without
intervening disasters. If just these two countries could be helped to
introduce SB housing on a massive scale it would greatly improve the
future world-wide energy picture.
As pointed out earlier, there is
much less incentive for large corporations to be interested in
promoting SB technology as compared to solar and wind energy
products. Therefore, if the major energy saving potential of SB
construction is to be realized, it is important for governments
overseas, nationally, statewide and locally to become involved in
promotion. Carbon credit trading markets for SB usage by industry,
and IRS tax credits for SB use in homes like those for energy saving
autos, windows, solar panels, etc., could be instituted. In the
long run, government funding for demonstration projects, technical
education and training in the US and overseas would be far cheaper
than the high cost of energy.
China has already produced cities full of futuristic architecture. Imagine if this inventiveness were used to create quality straw bale homes in the suburbs and rural areas of the country. Buildings could be visually exciting, highly energy efficient, and resistant to their tragic earthquakes.
China has already produced cities full of futuristic architecture. Imagine if this inventiveness were used to create quality straw bale homes in the suburbs and rural areas of the country. Buildings could be visually exciting, highly energy efficient, and resistant to their tragic earthquakes.
These costs will impact us in ways
we are only beginning to see. Recent mega storms and droughts are a
wake-up call. They will affect the economy leading either to higher
prices or less economic activity, and potential loss of tax revenues.
Government costs to assist the poor with their energy needs promises
to be very high. Tax payers are becoming ever more resistant to
providing for those needs.
SOURCES
MacDonald, S.O. & Myhrman, M.:
Build it with Bales, Out on Bale, Tucson, AZ, 1995.
Steen, A.S., Steen, B. &
Bainbridge, D. (with D. Eisenberg): The Straw Bale House,
Chelsea Green Publishing Co., White River Junction, VT, 1994.
Williams, K.: Personal communication,
Strawbuild.com.
* In 2006 I visited a one bedroom
strawbale home that had survived severe hurricanes behind Pensacola,
Florida with NO damage. Large trees were blown down nearby.
© Lee Aikin, Oct. 2005 (Revised 3/13).
May be reproduced for non-commercial use.
Lee has been interested in
environmental issues for more than 50 years and has identified
strawbale as an application with tremendous potential for energy
savings. She is available for lectures and demonstrations to
appropriate groups.
No comments:
Post a Comment