The conservative take on this 5% figure was that this was a very low rate of pregnancy and thus tended to confirm Todd Akin's ignorant science ideas. I was so ticked off reading this I decided to do a Google search. There I found a figure of 36,000 rape pregnancies a year, of which one half were terminated. Regarding the important issue of how many unprotected sex acts result in pregnancy, I could find no specific figure. However, a statistical analysis of estimated unprotected sex acts per year per couple, the average number of days per month a woman was likely to be fertile, and similar factors resulted in a figure of 3% to 5% probability of a single unprotected sex act producing a pregnancy.
Thus, it appears there is absolutely NO statistical basis for imagining some unknown protective means a rape victim can use to stop implantation by an alien invading parasite. Since it appears pregnancy rates actually might be lower in non-rape situations, Akin's remarks are without foundation. Perhaps rapists favor younger women who do get pregnant at a higher rate per act than do older women. Also if a consenting woman does NOT want to get pregnant, she can always say no, or use a condom.
It is bad enough a MAN running for Congress could be so ignorant of basic science, but we also must look at the issue of what constitutes "legitimate rape". He has tried to apologize for this statement by explaining he meant rape by "force and violence." However, Paul Ryan, Todd Akin and other Republicans attempted to include a provision to limit abortion to forcible rape in a proposed Federal anti-abortion bill to rewrite the Hyde Amendment. This also suggests they think a 10 year old being raped by her "loving" father or uncle would be likely to fight to the point of bruises and broken bones. Or that a 28 year old man has the right to seduce a physically developed 13 year old girl.
Now (August 2015) an interesting chart of various Republican politicians' statements on rape has been posted. These choice statements range from sincere statements that "a rape child should be considered a 'gift' from God," to the cute statement, "that when rape is inevitable you should relax and enjoy it." Regarding this current election cycle see the 2012 quote from current Republican presidential candidate, Rick Santorum "The right approach is to accept this horribly created, in the sense of rape, but nevertheless...the gift of human life, and accept what God is giving you." I'm sorry, but if God is giving such "gifts", to quote a friend, "If God would do that to unborn babies, I might believe in him, but I would NOT WORSHIP him." See also Ron Paul's statement there.
[In March 2015 we are now seeing Republican ideology at work to sneak the Hyde Amendment into a bill to protect women from sex slavery and trafficking. They are trying to use this abortion prevention law to interfere with spending of a special dedicated fund to help women. This fund is made from fines against traffickers, NOT FROM TAXPAYERS as many are being led to believe. How can they be so incredibly callous as to withhold funds from girls and women who may be escaping from a terrible situation but carrying the spawn of a criminal and rapist. Of course, to Republican men it appears that any male seed, however tainted, is more important than a rescued girl or woman. They are also using the controversy to withhold approval of an eminently qualified female candidate for Attorney General. In April 2015, Loretta Lynch was finally confirmed by the Senate. Although in this article the delay was attributed to the immigration issue.
In the late 1990's a significant drop in murder rates and other crimes was noted. It was suggested that legalization of abortion in 5 states in 1970, and the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide in early 1973 was the main factor. This detailed May 2001 article in The Quarterly Journal of Economics concludes it was an important factor. In 2008, Fox News attempted to explain why this detailed analysis was wrong. Their article concluded, "Even if abortion did lower crime by culling out 'unwanted' children (a conclusion derived from flawed statistics), this effect would be greatly outweighed by the rise in crime associated with the greater incidence of single-parent families that also follows from abortion liberalization. In short, more abortions have brought more crime."
The conclusion that abortion rights have brought more crime is ridiculous considering that crime rates have continued to drop significantly. Nor does the Fox News (Republican's go-to news source) article provide any useful charts and statistical analysis. This 2008 article is an early example of the Republican lie machine at work. FactCheck in July 2016 has several charts showing what a lie the 2008 article was. Some major cities, including DC, have had significant murder rate increases since 2014, but there are those who attribute that rise to publicity regarding stupid and malicious police killings and the rise of the"black lives matter" movement. More timid policing has been suggested as a factor too.
President-elect, Donald Trump has exaggerated this temporary increase as the FactCheck article points out. Someone should tell him that if he succeeds in following through with all the abortion restrictions his far right backers propose, some day he may have to explain why his administration had much higher crime rates than did the Obama years. On the other hand if his reaction turns out to be much more aggressive policing, we may see a far higher rate of deadly police shootings.
Here is a significant quote from an article outlining the way Republicans highjack laws that are sold as helping women, which are then used to hurt them even more. Sickening!!
"...'The same Gospel that compels us to war against sex trafficking compels us to address sexual immorality in all its forms.' That, of course is the main point. Religious crusaders against sex trafficking say they're against trafficking--but really, they're against sex.
Trafficking is the "tip of the wedge," where evangelicals might make common cause with liberals and feminists. But ultimately, the wedge includes pornography, sex work, homosexuality, sex for pleasure, abortion, contraception--anything that might be construed as "sexual immorality." That broader agenda is evident in the way...laws have been written and enforced, and in the way the religious anti-trafficking movement has cast the struggle."]
[Nov. 19, 2016] In the light of the Trump victory, we need to be aware that changes forced on "Obamacare" and Planned Parenthood will have many consequences. This link on sexually transmitted diseases shows the danger budget cuts because of the Recession, have had on disease rates. With Republican attacks on existing sources of health care these rates will only get worse, and as the article points out the resulting health care costs are far greater.
Also of great interest is the "rape" case against President Elect Donald Trump, which will be heard in court this December (too bad it wasn't held before Nov. 8). There are many links to this story at Google, but I picked one from the British media, considering they might be more objective. Apparently there are two witnesses to this attack on a 13 year old.
Apparently the Federal bill would have denied Federally funded medical help for victims of drugged rape, statutory rape, and the like. Force and violence has to include the woman fighting hard and showing evidence of being beaten into submission. It is not enough to make a rational decision if a knife is held to your throat, or a gun displayed with a statement that you will be shot if you resist, that perhaps the wisest course is not to resist. The question can be raised, "where is the knife, where is the gun and did you know if it was loaded or not??" This form of a glib approach by Republicans to the whole subject of rape was personified in 1990 by Texas Republican gubernatorial candidate Clayton Williams who wisecracked comparing bad weather and rape: "if it's inevitable, just relax and enjoy it." Democrat Ann Richards had been behind by 11 points, but ended up winning by 2 points.
Even more disturbing is that Ryan seems to be against most forms of birth control. You would think someone who wants to reduce abortion would want to encourage women to plan for wanted pregnancies. People who recognize our planet is under severe pressure from population growth, including Green Party members, realize it is a highly ethical and moral stance not to produce excessive numbers of children, and especially unwanted, unloved babies. Here is a particularly ugly story of a religious country forcing an 11 year old girl to bear the child of her rapist stepfather.
What is it about "pro-life" (let's call them anti-choice) people that so many seem to want to force others to reproduce as much as possible?? Yet many of these same people are very pro- military and pro-hunting which tends to be anti-life. They are also very active in their efforts to destroy Planned Parenthood even though only 3% of Planned Parenthood activities are associated with terminating pregnancies. They don't seem to care about the other 97% of health care so many women especially poor women need. Also, although many are against government interference, in this case they want to use the government to promote their agenda. I guess part of their agenda is the production of "cannon fodder."
[2/9/16] - How will Republicans respond to the Zika virus. This mosquito borne virus already seems to have caused hundreds of infants in Brazil to be born with shrunken heads and brains (microcephaly). Now infected people have been found in the US and it also appears to be spreadable by sexual activity. Ilyse Hogue, President of NARAL Pro-Choice America has started a petition to Republican president frontrunner candidates Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, and Donald Trump. She urges these candidates, who each come from states where the Zika virus has been detected, to support universal contraceptive coverage and women's access to to the tools to delay pregnancy if so wished (such as provided by Planned Parenthood, which Republicans are trying hard to destroy). She points out that millions of American women don't know whether it would be healthy to become pregnant with the spread of the Zika virus--and they deserve to have the ability to delay a healthy pregnancy. She says each of the GOP frontrunnes has attacked universal contraceptive coverage in the past.Click here to add your name to this petition, and then pass it along to your friends.
"U.N.: Zika-affected nations must increase contraception access," USA Today, February 5, 2016http://act.moveon.org/go/1253?t=4&akid=161863.23102069.RM6HSa
[11/30/15] - This just in, Republicans are not the only ones making outrageous rape statement. The first lady of Zimbabwe has publicly implied that girls who wear mini-skirts in public deserve to get raped. Her husband, meanwhile, is using the United Nations to promote his anti-gay agenda. He says that even Satan is NOT gay. On the other hand their legislature appears to be moving to require castration of rapists.
[1/10/17] - I have just seen an email urging support to prevent Mike Pence from passing a law that would enable parents to electroshock their minor children to cure them from homosexuality. Researching this concern I found this article claiming Pence said Conversion Therapy enabled him to get married. In light of the controversy regarding Pence, Conversion Therapy, and electroshock for minors, The New York Times published this 11/30/16 article regarding their findings. Given the overall Republican attitude toward women and the helpless, it pays to remain alert, especially since the Trump election.
To top it all off, the draft of this year's (2012) GOP platform calls for a constitutional amendment banning access to abortion, making no exceptions for women who have been victims of rape or incest, or when the life of the mother is at risk. They are even using the Constitution to justify this "cruel and unusual" amendment. There are at least a few sensible blue state Republicans who do not favor including this provision. Let us hope there are even more sensible voter who will reject this moral insanity promoted by the GOP. [Actually in January 2015, a revolt of GOP women stopped the new GOP majority from pushing such stupidity.]